Been listening to Talksport for a couple of hours now, meant to catch the 7am UK time talk, but I missed it by 1 hour. I listened on, and the focus was on the tackle at the Stoke – Fulham game last night. I didn’t know anything about it nor did I see any news reports online, so I was surprised they are talking a lot about it. Went to check out the video, even though it wasn’t replayed in slo-mo, the follow-through in real-time is really rash.
If anybody had watched the Arsenal – Tottenham Carling Cup match last night, Wilshere was fouled 3 times in a row by different Spurs players. Clearly, they had to stop him to disrupt Arsenal’s play but putting in fouls and tackles to floor Wilshere shows that they can do nothing about him except to foul him. The more possession Arsenal had, the more frustrated Tottenham, or any other opponents will be. The frustration grew and therefore more fouls. I have no qualms with opponents putting in tackles to win the ball, but as the time ticks down, they feel the urgency to get the ball back. With that urgency in mind, rash tackles come in.
The people on Talksport debated about teaching tackles to the players. One said that tackles cannot be taught to players as it’s a matter of whether you know it or don’t. The other argued that the art of tackling can be taught, especially when players are still young. I’m sure it’s not easy to teach a player how to tackle, because you can only teach them how to tackle, not when to tackle. Situations change every time, so if a player wants to put in a tackle, he has to make decisions when to go in with the tackle. Coaches can talk however much they want about when to tackle, but ultimately the decision is made by the players. With the game going so fast, decisions are forced to be made faster too. You don’t have time to think about tackling or not. You could argue that if a player is taught the right way of tackling, but it’s the decision-making that makes it a good or bad tackle. It’s a very fine line.
On other point, Kieran Gibbs! Please, let him not be seriously injured. Arsenal fans are really impressed with him since last year, and after he broke his metatarsal he missed out a lot of games he could have started in. Hopefully this is just a small injury, and that he can come back fit soon. His importance has grown a lot recently, mainly to rotate between him and Clichy now that Traore is out on loan. He has shown he is capable to play in big games too, which will help Wenger as he rotates the 2 probably more evenly this season to ease their game play. IF *touch wood* Gibbs does have a serious injury and will be out for months, I’m wondering if Arsene Wenger will bring in Tom Cruise to deputize, or bring 1 of the centre-half to play left back for odd games. I’ve seen Eboue and Sagna play left-back in games but they were asked to play there due to injuries during the games. As short-term it’s possible to play someone out of their position at left-back, but long-term rotation wise properly not? To be honest, I won’t be surprised to see Cruise come in IF Gibbs is out for months. Left backs to Arsenal is like an endless pit to a pot of gold.
The current talking story is about the Brentford win over Everton, which is quite fitting considering 1 of the host is an Everton fan, the other is a Brentford fan. The only thing I know about Brentford is that Szczesny was on loan over there for a few months. One of the talking point is on the Brentford goalkeeper, and I can’t help to think that if Szczesny had stayed on loan there, he would have been the talking point now. It’s been noted that Szczesny has been unhappy about not playing any games, especially in the Carling Cup which apparently he had discussed with Wenger before the season started. Wenger made him stay instead of go out on loan, hoping to get a few games for Szczesny this season. I don’t see how he’s going to get any games considering Vito Mannone is probably slightly ahead of him in terms of age and experience. He understands that being at his age it’s hard to be first choice at a big club like Arsenal, but he’s not happy with the non-progress of his playing career. Personally, if he doesn’t get any games at Arsenal, he might as well go out on loan. Mannone is sitting quietly for his chance, but if he doesn’t get games, he might as well go out on loan too. Not going to comment about Fabianski. Almunia has been good so far, solid and more confident. The shout he made at Blackburn to come and get the ball from a corner still rang in my ear. Good progress there, a lot more commanding.
I’ve mentioned this before on Twitter, that the media are known to blow up stories in order to get readers. Sometimes they blow a story so out of proportion that the more people talk about it, the more worse it gets. I don’t need to list any examples, but I think a lot of people understand. As football fans, we often cry out to media or complain about stuff they write that aren’t true. Just like pundits too. They can be pro or anti to a certain team, and talk cock about the good and bad stuff when they sometimes don’t know what else to talk about. Naturally of they are talking bad about your team, you get pissed. I often forget about those reports and focus on those good ones.
Kind of interested to watch some of the League games tomorrow morning, that is if I can wake up. Just interested in the lineup the top teams are going to put out. It’s always fascinating and spells a lot about how much the club wants to win the Cup. After that will be the draw on Saturday. I wonder who Arsenal will get, whoever they are, hope we get them at home.